Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
documentation:language_reference:objects:responsefunction:start [2024/12/20 17:07] Maurits W. Haverkortdocumentation:language_reference:objects:responsefunction:start [2025/11/20 04:15] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 73: Line 73:
 Internally response functions can be stored in different formats. We need several formats as (1) transformations between the different formats take time (2) transformations between different formats can involve a loss of numerical accuracy and (3) different algorithms require the response function in different formats. The formats used in Quanty to store response functions are Internally response functions can be stored in different formats. We need several formats as (1) transformations between the different formats take time (2) transformations between different formats can involve a loss of numerical accuracy and (3) different algorithms require the response function in different formats. The formats used in Quanty to store response functions are
   - List of poles $$ G(\omega,\Gamma) = A_0 + \sum_{i=1}^{n} B_{i-1} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - a_i} $$   - List of poles $$ G(\omega,\Gamma) = A_0 + \sum_{i=1}^{n} B_{i-1} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - a_i} $$
-  - Tri-diagonal $$ G(\omega,\Gamma) = A_0 + B_0^* \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_1 - B_{1}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_2 - B_{2}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_2 - B_{3}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{...}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_{n-1} - B_{n-1}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_n } B_{n-1}^{\dagger}} B_{3}^{\dagger} } B_{2}^{\dagger} } B_{1}^{\dagger} } B_0^T $$+  - Tri-diagonal $$ G(\omega,\Gamma) = A_0 + B_0^* \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_1 - B_{1}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_2 - B_{2}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_3 - B_{3}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{...}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_{n-1} - B_{n-1}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_n } B_{n-1}^{\dagger}} B_{3}^{\dagger} } B_{2}^{\dagger} } B_{1}^{\dagger} } B_0^T $$
   - Anderson $$ G(\omega,\Gamma) = A_0 + B_0^* \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_1 - \sum_{i=2}^{n} B_{i-1}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_{i} } B_{i-1}^{\dagger} } B_0^T $$   - Anderson $$ G(\omega,\Gamma) = A_0 + B_0^* \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_1 - \sum_{i=2}^{n} B_{i-1}^{\phantom{\dagger}} \frac{1}{\omega + \mathrm{i}\Gamma/2 - A_{i} } B_{i-1}^{\dagger} } B_0^T $$
   - Natural Impurity. We define $G_{val}(\omega,\Gamma)$ and $G_{con}(\omega,\Gamma)$ as response functions with poles either at positive energy ($G_{con}(\omega,\Gamma)$) or poles at negative energy ($G_{val}(\omega,\Gamma)$). The full response function is defined as $$ G(\omega,\Gamma) = A_0 + B_0^* \left( G_{val}(\omega,\Gamma) + G_{con}(\omega,\Gamma) \right) B_0^T$$    - Natural Impurity. We define $G_{val}(\omega,\Gamma)$ and $G_{con}(\omega,\Gamma)$ as response functions with poles either at positive energy ($G_{con}(\omega,\Gamma)$) or poles at negative energy ($G_{val}(\omega,\Gamma)$). The full response function is defined as $$ G(\omega,\Gamma) = A_0 + B_0^* \left( G_{val}(\omega,\Gamma) + G_{con}(\omega,\Gamma) \right) B_0^T$$ 
Print/export